Mail Archives: opendos/1997/02/03/19:53:20
Once upon a time (on 2 Feb 97 at 18:47) Colin W. Glenn said:
> Well, how about finding a good middling ground, one which allows for
> LFN's, but includes a bit of test code to _ensure_ that selected LFN's
> contain a descent 8.3 name within? To expand on this:
>
> Say you have a fully qualified filename called:
>
> > > [...]
> > > >I think that OpenDOS should progress in a NEW direction, by adding
> > > >somehthing like ext2 support STANDARD. It may not work with old
> > connectivity package). We need not only to provide a superior fs,
> > but also to provide TRANSPARENT translation for programs accessing
> > [snip]
>
> c:/thisone/second.level/real.filename.ext.z
>
> Which the system will hand to a 8.3 program as:
>
> c:\thisone\second.lev\realfile.z
>
> Should you generate a file called:
>
> c:/thisone/second.level/real.filelist.ext.z
>
> The OS complains:
>
> New filename conflicts with prior 8.3 name!
>
> and shows you the conflict. Should you chose to ignore the error, the
> system informs you:
>
> Warning! 8.3 programs will only see first occurance of file!
>
> Is this workable?
I think that the W95 solution is acceptable here: number tags. Or just use
the unused space in standard M$-DOG dirent to store the number tag (sorta
file versions on VMS or ISO)
^DJGPP - 32 bit compiler for THE programmer ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^&
Have you ever woke up swearing in the middle of the night?
You search the darkness and you scramble for the light.
Have you ever walked down the street, heard footsteps following you?
Don't worry my son, you've got the spooks all looking after you.
----
Visit http://www.delorie.com/djgpp AND
http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/djgpp.html
- Raw text -