Message-Id:	<199702022233.XAA01683@math.amu.edu.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	What? (Poznan, Poland)
To:	jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com
Date:	Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:39:40 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32?
Reply-to:	grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
References:	<199702020421 DOT XAA26504 AT keeper DOT albany DOT net>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.NXT.3.95.970202001730.27399C-100000@eagle1>
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

Once upon a time (on  2 Feb 97 at 0:18) jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com said:

> Why not make the fat 32 an I.F.S?  Then this way if it's
> supplied users can decide which way they'd like to go.
Coz there's no documentation of IFS interface. Besides it's an M$ standard 
and, as such, is being kept secret ;-)). I'd vote for developing an 
OpenDOS-specific format of such an installable FS driver (and one that can be 
dynamically loaded/unloaded without all that black magic needed to remove an 
installed SYS driver on DOS)

********************************************************
For when it comes down to it there's no use trying to
  pretend. For when it comes down to there's no one really
left to blame - blame it on me, you can blame it on me
We're just sugar mice on the rain.
----
Visit http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel

- Raw text -