delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <199702022233.XAA01683@math.amu.edu.pl> |
Comments: | Authenticated sender is <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl> |
From: | "Mark Habersack" <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl> |
Organization: | What? (Poznan, Poland) |
To: | jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:39:40 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32? |
Reply-to: | grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl |
CC: | OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net> |
References: | <199702020421 DOT XAA26504 AT keeper DOT albany DOT net> |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.NXT.3.95.970202001730.27399C-100000@eagle1> |
Sender: | owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net |
Once upon a time (on 2 Feb 97 at 0:18) jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com said: > Why not make the fat 32 an I.F.S? Then this way if it's > supplied users can decide which way they'd like to go. Coz there's no documentation of IFS interface. Besides it's an M$ standard and, as such, is being kept secret ;-)). I'd vote for developing an OpenDOS-specific format of such an installable FS driver (and one that can be dynamically loaded/unloaded without all that black magic needed to remove an installed SYS driver on DOS) ******************************************************** For when it comes down to it there's no use trying to pretend. For when it comes down to there's no one really left to blame - blame it on me, you can blame it on me We're just sugar mice on the rain. ---- Visit http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |