From:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Date:	Sun, 2 Feb 1997 14:14:43 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
To:	jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com
cc:	OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [opendos] A suggestion for DOSBOOK.
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.NXT.3.95.970202124206.6835G-100000@eagle1>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970202141228.5878q-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

On Sun, 2 Feb 1997 jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com wrote:

> dos edit for sure doesn't have any switch that improves
> screen writes, I've checked that out long ago.  The opendos edit might.

Well, Linux must be capturing video memory and sending it out to
remote telnet sessions then.  Funny thing is, I've ran multiple
sessions at once and they all work!  Beyond the amount of free video
memory too!  I'm running X in the foreground and several DOS EDIT's in
telnet sessions.  They all function normally.  Maybe EDIT detects
wether or not it can access vid mem directly?  I don't know.

I guess all that can be done is to wait and see.


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |    My webpage has moved and my address has changed.
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

LINUX: Lost your video after running a game or DOSemu, email me for fix.

- Raw text -