Mail Archives: opendos/1997/01/20/09:55:21
On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church wrote:
> >> There should be no problem, but don't take my word for it. When it comes
> >> out, TEST it on something you don't mind losing. If you want to use 95 and
> >> OpenDOS, install OpenDOS first, then Win95. Win95 will allow you to "boot
> >> to a previous version of DOS". Also, OpenDOS doesn't currently support the
> >> FAT32 standard that Win95OSR2 (Win96?) uses.
> >Well, that's why I was asking...it's basically not feasible for me to
> >reinstall everything simply for the functionality of a cool multi-tasking
> >DOS... :( I hate that...
>
> Well, what I was planning to do (and someone please tell me if this is
> idiotic) was making a tiny partition on my main hard drive and making it
> boot OpenDOS, switching between M$-DOS and OpenDOS by changing my Active
> Partition in fdisk. (I've tested this before with other operating
> systems, and it has worked, so I assume this would work as well.)
DOS is brain damaged and wont boot off of other partitions. OpenDOS
however may do so. I suspect that it either can, or someone can make it
once the sources are out.
Regardless, I wouldn't use FDISK for this purpose. It is like shaving
with a machete. Even LILO is safer IMHO.
Mike A. Harris http://www3.sympatico.ca/mharris
My dynamic address: http://www3.sympatico.ca/mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT sympatico DOT ca mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
The Art Bell homepage: http://www.artbell.com
- Raw text -