From:	"Don Walker" <donw AT austin DOT rr DOT com>
To:	<hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: new eda tools
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:02:19 -0500
Message-ID:	<JCEGJNKBMGIEPOMLDNAGOEJKEOAA.donw@austin.rr.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To:	<200208261752.g7QHqJZ15227@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Cool, it's been a while since I looked at it and for some reason I was
thinking it only did two layers.

DonW...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DJ Delorie [mailto:dj AT delorie DOT com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:52 PM
> To: hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: new eda tools
>
>
>
> > To achieve the form factor we were talking about we were estimating
> > a 6 to 8 layer board.
>
> PCB supports 8 layer boards.  If you need more, edit globalconst.h and
> #define it to a higher value.  MUCS defaults to allowing up to 16
> layers.  If you have a specific concern, I'll look at the sources and
> see what's up and if it can be fixed.  And yes, I *know* the libraries
> all stink, but building new ones from scratch for the specific
> components we use won't be difficult.
>
> I looked at Eagle but I didn't feel like spending $3000 to get all the
> features you'd need to do "everything" (complex boards with
> autorouting).  And I wasn't impressed when I found that their RS232
> footprints were on 100 mil centers instead of 108 like they're
> supposed to be.

- Raw text -