From:	"Don Walker" <donw AT austin DOT rr DOT com>
To:	<hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: new eda tools
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:41:29 -0500
Message-ID:	<JCEGJNKBMGIEPOMLDNAGMEJJEOAA.donw@austin.rr.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To:	<20020826152515.GB11994@willow.seitz.com>
Reply-To:	hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I will also re-state my interest in the project, however, I don't
believe that even with DJ's enhancements, that these tools are up to
what we were targeting.  To achieve the form factor we were talking
about we were estimating a 6 to 8 layer board.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Vandegrift [mailto:ross AT willow DOT seitz DOT com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: new eda tools
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:39:08PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >
> > I finished up the first phase of my PCB optimization tools.
>  With this
> > and the MUCS router integration, gschem+pcb+mucs is a reasonable set
> > of tools to use for PCB design.
> >
> > http://www.delorie.com/hobbyplat/edatools/
> >
> > Is anyone still interested in working on this beast?  I've got a
> > handle on building the libraries for gschem and pcb.
>
> I'll register my continuing interest, but PCB design level
> isn't yet to
> the point where I can help much...
>
> --
> Ross Vandegrift
> ross AT willow DOT seitz DOT com

- Raw text -