X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] empty attributes
In-reply-to:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2109251919580.1189@nimbus>
References:	<20210925133011 DOT D0B918587B70 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2109251919580 DOT 1189 AT nimbus>
Comments:	In-reply-to Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
	message dated "Sat, 25 Sep 2021 19:22:57 +0200."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20210925194712.152EA8587FD0@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Sat, 25 Sep 2021 21:47:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Roland Lutz:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2021, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > In a hierarchical design, where the top source symbols are like 
> > "power.sch", "system.sch" (for the mcu), "dac.sch", etc. it would be 
> > convenient to have a empty refdes in thoose top level source symbols to 
> > not to get a overly long final refdes for footprints.
> 
> Have you considered turning refdes= mangling off?

Yes, since long ago.

> Alternatively, you could use multiple top-level schematics:
>    http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:hierarchy

Ok, that is a possibility for the top level sch, not for any
subsheets, so it is not what I'm looking for.
 And it is nice to have "here is the design,
click this to look at this subsystem/card/whatever", as an
orientational tool also.

///

Is there any rationale to not to allow empty attributes
(except that it isn't implemented) ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

- Raw text -