X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-CMAE-Analysis:	v=2.4 cv=MZ2pB7zf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=608a3bcf
	a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=1yK/BHxyC4ZmIdxpzi4zFw==:17
	a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=3YhXtTcJ-WEA:10 a=2oAn-hFjyh9eOH-F14kA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT:	glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=epilitimus.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
	In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:
	Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
	Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=q4Q4v1R317cmrLVa3F5x5sJ4QBo2w2xGDmwMVbv+JOU=; b=GiVOWzO9PrcqtpIMJi3+vUoBu8
	b7dIoH2aacKJ+Ozcn76cxr3gdGL7c1s7ve0a25jrzOhWm1kA1XTv/CaqI1tH8rHK7ZCFq1wx2jxTJ
	YwYeDyS6rarlBqcReSGF/Dq83e7rVJpUSiJ1oYZCQ2KTKfu5aNIcRpDgy0Y4+iI+u17vhAbUF+AAM
	p1MjCg/sEty/CRqRE82ks351+9nkvW4y2iZjbXzGrEKeGPmfSNImHiJ7Rb+nWu395jBtM64QA9P5n
	bdKYYGQPwkLZM/muK7EDwycRG8K/s4SlkrZUTepBBN5PnpG8rLFTQAFgO66f2sb1XhCCvi9UWQQpz
	/htJPS8Q==;
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] xspice integration
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<b609b43e-9209-3809-ef0e-d3b1e4b11c3c AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104142041100 DOT 7753 AT nimbus>
	<9fe0dd9a-cbb8-a51f-f63d-36cd6d3a31c7 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104172241210 DOT 6430 AT nimbus>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104231908590 DOT 5702 AT nimbus>
	<4775a561-41ad-5368-271a-998ded5bfbc6 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104232352150 DOT 14831 AT nimbus>
	<e2ab51e4-29df-35e0-e16b-4f48dcbc81c8 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104241511400 DOT 1853 AT nimbus>
	<07d13043-cd66-88f1-4b6c-172345c864e1 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104252228270 DOT 2187 AT nimbus>
	<1425fd69-5796-6cde-198b-8218f71e187d AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104261411160 DOT 1258 AT nimbus>
	<f2175a47-3c7b-843b-a966-63f01e23ec94 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2104262141230 DOT 13961 AT nimbus>
From:	"Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<9d55627f-942e-f4f5-aeea-c4754381e72e@epilitimus.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:53:37 -0800
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
	Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2104262141230.13961@nimbus>
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via:	a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Authenticated-Sender:	a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfN0LsZXDJZ84HHMMWv2wGiMkPfeLPcrqiH4dWa0GHQSK9VwCcRaGQNrFRHYkLlAdfhUNnp1MJw9xQECrh+j19FXMjGUrXCV9h64MZQ+R4oOJUD5cKCB/
	6oqP01f/W7P6filKnYX7lGlTyh/Jx9VAx5tSzTzJssQ4hYMh/pwcCiJoyscVuu8GHGrAa2L61T/ZgbLHkuhVlabCNtRi74Xsi9z5TmbTHzuR0MsEgobAc/BK
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Roland,
1. Do you have any objections to the symbol hierarchy being more than
one level deep. Specifically there are both control (e.g.
xspice_processor-1.sym) and functional (e.g. xspice_adb-1.sym) xspice
specific devices. My preference is to put them in a directory structure
like:
symbols/xspice/control
symbols/xspice/functional

But I don't see anywhere else in the symbol hierarchy that is more than
one level below the top level. I think a multiple level structure would
make them easier to find. What is your preference?

2. There are multiple groups of symbols, Some are xspice specific (e.g.
xspice_dab-1.sym), others are not (e.g. nfet-1.sym [geda currently
doesn't provide a jfet symbol so I drew one]). Do you prefer all the
symbols placed as one commit, one group per commit, one symbol per
commit? Keeping in mind different symbols go to different directories.

Glenn

- Raw text -