X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20210308160551.22607.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:05:51 +0000
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Fw: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board
References:	<20210308030229 DOT 4936b11f AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
	<24f5ba4f1cd5305994d137c9275705d8 AT iae DOT nl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<24f5ba4f1cd5305994d137c9275705d8@iae.nl>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

mhx AT iae DOT nl wrote:
> As Guile and Python both are interpreters, I assumed gEDA would
> still be completely configurable by the user.

I think they are and will continue to be, although the language changed.


> > TL;DR:
> > Use lepton-eda if you like scheme and enjoy hacking guile scripts to
> > adopt the suite to your special needs.
> > Stay with geda if you are more into python and would like to benefit
> > from the recent improvements of the gschem GUI.
> 
> Here you seem to be saying that hacking Python scripts is impossible.

I actually understood what he wrote to mean the opposite.


By the way, since Kai-Martin mentioned KiCad - it uses Python too,
and IMO that alone supports the gEDA move.

Yes, monoculture is bad, and Python has issues too, but interoperability
is important and personally I prefer Python over scheme/guile any day.


//Peter

- Raw text -