X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	comp
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	karl AT aspodata DOT se
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] why pinnumber in sym pins?
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20171226122009.366BF804CEDE@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Tue, 26 Dec 2017 13:20:09 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

 Why must one have a pinnumber attribute for each pin i a sym file:
http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:master_attributes_list#pinnumber

Wouldn't it suffice to have pinseq and pinlabel ?
Wouldn't it be useful to allow  to have just a function (pinlabel)
attached to the pin without knowing which pinnumber it will end up on ?

 E.g. dc/dc converters with single output usually have four pins
+/-Vin and +/-Vout in all sorts of packages where the pinnumber (from
the datasheet) can be anything but 1,2,3,4, but their pin names are
+/-Vin/Vout. So, it would be nice if one could map sym -> fp with
just the "pinlabel" (gschem) -> pin "Name" (pcb). But pcb doesn't seem
to support that idea.

Any suggestions or pointers ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57

- Raw text -