X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<7d12886d-a802-d5e3-1abf-b113e436a5ff AT tio DOT cz>
	<CAJZxidADm5AgKfDDzTpEQ+4T3VcYvhWjaA_Enm21R8PtDqouYA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<501527a2-ab82-4795-f8b5-2bb7a0795421 AT tio DOT cz>
	<CAJXU7q-r23EmTiveCaJQ0LDaMr+w4csRuO_zXp-uMgoYQH2a8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<44d9173e-c265-c444-210d-ae0fecea4b9f AT tio DOT cz>
	<CAJXU7q-XaPhaXt=WcHrYXgZRyNLGrsjBs2s0S2efRFXYZ91h6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<49fc9f73-b933-1d8e-f290-7c9aa6289ca7 AT tio DOT cz>
	<CAJZxidB6SqEZntW3Rertr_oZDosEcyrOD7r6t5z8LUi49mqQgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<15ce27d2-54a2-6c76-2962-d78178fafc26 AT tio DOT cz>
	<CAJZxidAuQa7Z9Y-=LEk07vKx-0SGK-DwnSZxv_pdC0OHpPqJ1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q-AP4X5cVgtJ_Wjgn+O_syNS1CH3RD+sQf5MOiQV+z8GQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<d78eab40-3693-8798-0449-1dc4ac54c094 AT tio DOT cz>
From:	"Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<5b689c99-5d60-df31-7e73-78e9bbd2a8e5@mcmahill.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:33:48 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<d78eab40-3693-8798-0449-1dc4ac54c094@tio.cz>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfHv1vFzR56TUoxKynfiQS9YtWZybzNe89l0PCtj5vwEQC1+TMTZKOG0RH8lztpqxwR0FhrHE7l1OxXO8tlAAuASDsh9KV4YlFF9RW9VM2cvmaJT2yFK7
	ifWx7MYxK8Wj9i9hiDcq8GyYRUvtvZnVgwjthFmxXV0kxFOMo37oTSE3
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2/18/2017 2:18 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
> On 02/17/17 11:58 PM, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2017 22:08, "Chad Parker (parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com
>> <mailto:parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com>) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com
>> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com
>> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Jan-
>>     Thanks again. Now we know that it's not just hiding somewhere we
>>     didn't expect.
>>
>>     Peter / anyone else who understands autotools-
>>     Is there a way that we can set up configure such that is looks for
>>     the pkg-config first, but falls back to the gdlib-config style
>>     configuration if pkg-config fails?
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     --Chad
>>
>>
>> It should be possible; it is basically just bash scripting at this point.
>>
>> Can do the pkgconfig test first, if that falls - run pretty match the
>> the old code which Dan removed when switching to pkg-config.
>>
>> I think this is an acceptable compromise, but I definitely want to
>> keep the pkg-config based test first.
>>
>> Peter
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> thank you for looking into this.
> While implementing this fallback mechanism would definitely solve that
> problem,
> I do not think it is worth the effort given the fact that user base of
> running
> Solaris as a desktop OS is pretty minimal (and further shrinking).
> As long as there is a reasonable way to build pcb on Solaris (and apparently
> there is one), I am fine with the current state of things.
>
> Thanks again,
> Jan

Sorry, I missed this in the very long thread with different topics....

I pushed out a fallback which is essentially the old method.  Another 
user had contacted me privately about it and we worked to get it fixed 
and left some notes about why.  Ubuntu precise I think was the OS 
causing him grief.

-Dan

- Raw text -