X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-IPAS-Result:	=?us-ascii?q?A2BPAgD7EqZY/wv01pZeGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1FhgQm?=
	=?us-ascii?q?NYZIPlTOCDCqFeAKCED8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYihCEAGEHQEBAQECATpPCxgJJQ8FG?=
	=?us-ascii?q?DETiWQHD68vD4NFi1UBAQEBBgEBAQEBHgWLO4J2hRKCMQWbf4ZwixqRE5MYHzi?=
	=?us-ascii?q?BACAUCCo9hkU/NQGGdYNBAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV:	E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484002800";
	d="scan'208";a="20814289"
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:02:40 +0100
From:	"Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	"Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested
Message-ID:	<20170216210240.GB4487@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<81a247cf-13f8-404d-c314-3e92903245ef AT prochac DOT sk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<81a247cf-13f8-404d-c314-3e92903245ef@prochac.sk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 15.02.2017 20:45, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >Hello list members,
> >
> >It has been almost a month to this day that a new release of pcb
> >was done.
> 
> As I use version from git, I cannot answer these question. But it do
> not see big changes there.

Same here, I've been using git version since it exists, and CVS before.

> 
> Now - when stable version is out - it is good time to think about
> the plans for next release and maybe about some more significant
> improvements.
> 
> What about blind/buried vias?
> 
> Milan
> 
> >
> >In this month there have been some 709 downloads of the tarball.
> >
> >What we active developers would like to have feedback on is:
> >
> >1) how many list members have downloaded the tarball ?
> >
> >  (0 or +1 suffices)
> >
> >2) how many list members have tried to build an run the new
> >version of pcb ?
> >
> >  (0 or +1 suffices)
> >
> >3) what was your user experience ? (what went good, what went bad,
> >what was the first impression after test driving, etc.).
> >
> >  (you can put the whole rant here ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >If you didn't download the tarball you can do that from:
> >
> >https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-4.0.0/
> >
> >
> >We hope to here from you soon ;-)
> >
> >Thanks in advance and with kind regards,
> >
> >Bert Timmerman
> >
> 
> 

- Raw text -