delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-IPAS-Result: | =?us-ascii?q?A2CBCACa06VY/wv01pZeHQEFAQsBg1FhgQmDC5xmlTOCDCq?= |
=?us-ascii?q?FeAKCDEAXAQIBAQEBAQEBYihCEAGEHgEFJwsBOxsLGAkaCw8FGESJaw+yVDqLO?= | |
=?us-ascii?q?wELASWLO4JbgVUHAQFngmiCMQWJB4Y/gUiKcYZwixqCCFOOOIgtimsgATaBACA?= | |
=?us-ascii?q?UCCo9gg6CboFJPzWGdoEEDxeCFwEBAQ?= | |
X-IronPort-AV: | E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484002800"; |
d="scan'208";a="28685507" | |
Date: | Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:38:23 +0100 |
From: | "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it? |
the EDA ecosystem) + help needed | |
Message-ID: | <20170216163823.GA31909@visitor2.iram.es> |
References: | <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702130818300 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702160811400 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1702160811400.7286@igor2priv> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:22:38AM +0100, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > Hi all, > > status update: > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > >2. what's the minimum we'd need to do for a working "edacore" setup: > > > >http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/devlog/20170213_edacore1.html > > people have downloaded these docs from 40 unique IPs, but I got 0 > feedback - sort of "as expected". > > I contacted the edacore project, but it seems our vision totally > differs, so we should just do two different projects. > > I also seeked some of the gEDA project leaders, hoping we could do > this together, but I failed. > > So I started to do it alone, hoping that it would be useful and/or > adapted by other projects (including, but _not_ limited to gEDA > members). The cost was so low that even if it ends up just "yet > another file format" only one tool uses, it's still not a big loss. > > > The name is tEDAx - Trivial EDA eXchange. Focusing on > trivial-to-implement file exchange for the common-minimum data. > Project page and specificaitons: http://repo.hu/projects/tedax > > > A hint on costs of adoption: I wrote the reference parser and a > tEDAx netlist (schematics) importer plugin in pcb-rnd in about 70 > minutes total. > > Why should we care: short term I believe tEDAx can solve a serious > design falw in our gschem* -> pcb* flow that I will describe in > another mail in another thread. Here TEDAX means: "Técnico Especialista en Desactivación de Artefactos Explosivos". These are the people which are called for example when a bomb from a previous war is found. In English the more or less equivalent term is EOD (explosive ordnance disposal). What kind of bomb are you trying to prevent from exploding? :-) [Yes, I deliberately refrained from entering the recent flamewars^W discussions on this mailing list.] Gabriel
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |