X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
	:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ZR1jtI+AOptzeYAE3xnvNzjLP+IVj2fRex0ZeBd3MxI=;
	b=EwiGY23lSDN9uxyl2fepTWEF5w8DT5fEUCIz4bQu2/KSK2FbAaGTJRpna0Gpr9Td4l
	+7Q2YwCvRIHRpN3n4PkzLCri2/5hfTi6vpC8OoCIBx2ZKs213jcdQYwKKNfTcyXds+zg
	+Ly5QkUx3BHssw45oONOX1hSD/sqoEdweNW2l+qHW4dSfNtp6iUMG06ZpsmpUFPiiUEO
	UkemwRAVatxrFO370NxpVqFXsLh/dDZzRBqV2cdX41CGI39AMJltzWKc/ltbjxz19dtf
	rHKOe1fYmHKb5iDNXCQru3S3F74yQc/TRTMCr+puM+WLR1Z/B5l/aXTmrHyfJxy9At+z
	pRJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ZR1jtI+AOptzeYAE3xnvNzjLP+IVj2fRex0ZeBd3MxI=;
	b=eNkZlxpSG5Et07D392LPZWBKqjmUFl0gwaFb4b5ZAt2wOBeP/EUcpLy2VDBY+0QeeC
	67HfbLAeXcHedIWRrxxRQoqPlgLhZSwZK9x+ru3kIaFoy8Nc3sP0k4+yYl5r8K8VVRSb
	x73xMdLMyNI5EZjVpQlw7/WX/WmppmnHGivkNNLuUWv8m5gZQSpDMlpXcOTodR4bdiqL
	fIr9wEln0IaAIol1ieFpm3sI8ZKwJPRSQLHRrYOXjhqJL41nXsagU5qUFOsh9ONPGtLS
	MH62ao/Br4mCeQ43zDa/UC94k/fCfPfFSdpVFcqbJTg7xo7ecf/RutDMY07xCoGunTA9
	gw7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AMke39nNblRZU2Eo+IRlO4uHQn/c9GeLs0Kj2nnwXCipnYmGT2HCqVZzuYT2ftywVU3+xD8GregYCpFPcTUwLw==
X-Received:	by 10.107.129.222 with SMTP id l91mr24938132ioi.194.1487082107623;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:21:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	svenn DOT bjerkem AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<C57AF350-004B-4ED2-BABF-B9905DEC294F@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhQQo8_KAb2p4LqSrmSBKYM1hyeRdmzDn3XqeTjxdpFtKw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C57AF350-004B-4ED2-BABF-B9905DEC294F AT noqsi DOT com>
From:	"Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:21:47 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth:	CxMARHb7ZkEceuJd8SSohLOY3uQ
Message-ID:	<CAGde_xNNgXdP4AZpftypFi2W2bt6cZ3qzHTH2+pu96mstyhgzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] We are about to alienate users was -> geda-gaf fork
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v1EELnwv032680
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 14 February 2017 at 12:47, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> The consequence of that if it happens will be two systems with different things named “gschem” and “gnetlist”. That will create even more confusion. I would very much prefer to see one unforked gEDA with two netlisters.

We need to hear from peterb and vzh what plans they have for gschem in
the fork. For me it is benefitial to have a gschem which is as generic
and back-end agnostic as possible as my focus is not pcb. As usual, I
will have to wait a while to see how the current changes in the pool
of designers impact the roadmap of gschem in mainline and forkline. It
is a pity that the situation is the way it is, but somehow there must
be some kind of consolidation in the forces that drive the development
forward. If nobody wants to 'own' geda-gaf the way it is, then it will
just be a spot for roadside picnics in the future where users just
have to live with whatever is left behind.

-- 
Svenn

- Raw text -