X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:02:23 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gnetlist chaos
In-Reply-To:	<2BB99BC4-D470-4C71-B09C-F3E2DF4BF301@noqsi.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1702121701150.14114@nimbus>
References:	<D0E30DB4-3ADF-415C-A95E-B58F09AE054D AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702111609100 DOT 25113 AT nimbus> <CAJXU7q_ogjTmEOjruGJ3od-GYdv_gef0X_yc7Fne1q6kDu1xrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170212090109 DOT GA450 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702121039420 DOT 2050 AT nimbus>
	<2BB99BC4-D470-4C71-B09C-F3E2DF4BF301 AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, John Doty wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 2:39 AM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:
>> Or let's phrase it the other way around: after I put a lot of effort 
>> into cleaning up the old netlister code, at a point where the 
>> cleaned-up code was ready to use and stable enough to make the old code 
>> obsolete, you stepped up and tried to undermine my work by introducing 
>> incompatible changes into the old version of the code.
>
> No, he cleaned up gnetlist. You wrote a substitute.

That's not true, as I already pointed out in the other thread.

- Raw text -