X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 9 Feb 2017 18:46:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Peter TB Brett (peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gEDA/gaf: want an advice
In-Reply-To:	<1af8aee7-f6c5-89f5-2298-b89788084ab3@peter-b.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1702091827340.2487@nimbus>
References:	<1af8aee7-f6c5-89f5-2298-b89788084ab3 AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi Peter,

it's nice to hear from you again.

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Peter TB Brett (peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I've joined in working on this branch [1], because I did several years 
> of work on getting gEDA into a decent state and I'm pleased to see 
> someone building on it.
>
> I've added several performance improvements in libgeda, and fixed a 
> whole load of stability bugs in gschem.

What are your reasons for committing your patches to Vladimir's branch?
Is there something you don't consider `decent' about the main repository?

> If you like using geda 1.8.2 and you want something that's fully 
> backward-compatible and stable

As is the code I refactored.  If you know of anything incompatible or 
unstable which I'm not aware of, please let me know so I can fix it.

Roland

- Raw text -