delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2016/07/23/12:18:56

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1469290656; bh=1EgoNCK4QbEERO1vWvoT9QxLVDaRW8VVvEyWuyhKktg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=Y2Kk2mxXNixkzN4KN1F7ufodJcDzXbKjvOMdH6KJI0YkKtx7PabCIWPd2sTdOWIjIPO9K/6K5BeFGIAgHaXvLZWzd+u38DoC3oUSK1KrJfkOehpXc0quneOSIUJvkYKxjnESKxhQBk08S2MFzvl/A38O7g0lO61nd16PWhQCgjvThRNYuS86Qj28QHCLqDHlf8jVbaCZ5LwGmhOzywZ+yibilFI5hWhM7Qwe2z5W1P4ts4+gpGDnN6Q3MWRNPjMpfGim4qOTK+H0jHvo7XxUtH6541Nr+pv9PUF5tQukHkhRBfasyWuhB51EQXFmiFeDn2T7LJtfezCSGJYjqhhMUA==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 618369 DOT 32493 DOT bm AT smtp120 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: cFR1fdkVM1m3ykzUoO7Nq30HI3kOJ4yR.igkzD4FYiZaYz1
lgQOW3F_EmUVsOvAC3KS7cFBzqF0Q.pDm3k4KLmObhe_XBR4oZxzoVncOmKJ
3xdlzKaCoHlpb1IuEp640Sd3sU7pCNmOD.c9bE6O2imTps_J9Lw3l64DGa4h
SxTeAi4rYGJru2C5H06Bm1VqZ7c5rFQZswKfT0td_VTWOza6mU5hjxDqbESL
5csuFO1jGYkr4ynvhEbsKnjN3Pjp7Q6JDx1LHzlGuS44cKIeBh1VLXXwagWY
sz_S1zeguLOYzBlYHAKIa.DtFVgV3Iy2RYnNR8t_CCBloEVF1r00C6Fcx8dC
P5GJLrkywxrBhVkkKmHej7LoCaIKmL69pMzBtZ0.ynayIAvDWRC8rJmsMENG
np6nN0sRrFntC0BQykmLXeH1B0mUrqxafaof0tWES3risGHMO2kyYzQ.TISN
s.eVrbeqDSP08Uq5Ma.2kdzfYuIjr2lGv71U0VQDloeONdQh5Z4Xl7UZl6Qu
xfAA1YCv65i_yEC9S5swD7OyZ1ULiUtdc2jqIRCOM8ZvKhKPZBFOi0sBmUPv
arcQ-
X-Yahoo-SMTP: b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA--
From: "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-Id: <BCA31465-6EDA-4181-A476-07F86D96057C@sbcglobal.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stay or go?
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 09:17:34 -0700
References: <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> <F2516359-5349-4052-A56E-9452DBCC7BD6 AT noqsi DOT com>
To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <F2516359-5349-4052-A56E-9452DBCC7BD6@noqsi.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

--Apple-Mail=_3D3258E5-6CC5-484F-9336-767A870AE2A3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


> On Jul 23, 2016, at 7:41 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>=20
>> It makes me wonder how long gschem/pcb will endure.
>=20
> You=92re asking the wrong question. Gschem does not lock you into pcb. =
If you=92re making printed circuit boards, I recommend a gschem->Osmond =
PCB flow. I=92ve exported gschem designs to many layout people, and the =
one who uses Osmond is by far the fastest and produces the best work. =
The others spend way more time, and sniff that Osmond is a tool for =
hobbyists, too simple for a true professional. Go figure.

Additionally, the gschem->PADS workflow has been painless for me. It=92s =
nice that gschem doesn=92t have vendor-lock-in on any particular =
workflow.

Ed


--Apple-Mail=_3D3258E5-6CC5-484F-9336-767A870AE2A3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=windows-1252

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dwindows-1252"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">On Jul 23, 2016, at 7:41 AM, John Doty &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:jpd AT noqsi DOT com" class=3D"">jpd AT noqsi DOT com</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div =
class=3D""><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; =
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; =
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: =
start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" =
class=3D"">It makes me wonder how long gschem/pcb will endure.<br =
class=3D""></blockquote><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: =
12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: =
normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; =
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: =
auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span=
 style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: =
none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline =
!important;" class=3D"">You=92re asking the wrong question. Gschem does =
not lock you into pcb. If you=92re making printed circuit boards, I =
recommend a gschem-&gt;Osmond PCB flow. I=92ve exported gschem designs =
to many layout people, and the one who uses Osmond is by far the fastest =
and produces the best work. The others spend way more time, and sniff =
that Osmond is a tool for hobbyists, too simple for a true professional. =
Go figure.</span></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">Additionally, the gschem-&gt;PADS workflow has been painless =
for me. It=92s nice that gschem doesn=92t have vendor-lock-in on any =
particular workflow.</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"">Ed</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_3D3258E5-6CC5-484F-9336-767A870AE2A3--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019