X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=YhbmKzhnc40GF2SwQaWjs7cp+GEZil2CtAeiCaNLlkY=;
	b=tb0C5MZpWYf6EXDvaEOsf3JS/74ExTbpcApV2jzycH+qGIfPBE8kFo2Mfi39nqzSUm
	/NZdEkZLkT0ASzCCdhOjT7Nwx1OX9VB+8t+md9yRMhNtBm38xSMc/CqVES+VwVS2j1uz
	YlqNzl/GD3yJm2qsYJN3EgBZHsy253IaX9PsyO1NAsw9hFB57Be/MqfCv6ZDEmJ/Pp5w
	zWIwSfwH7sDFwXwiKOg/VTq95/VUuDaYD7LmTLonPHESQQhl6vTWrSzjppZrryF+MBCa
	bB9QJK2AYo4TQb5I5nvsTaCXmgKQzwWKkNYebk11MZJs2iiCUsuhSBGUYvOnnexrpH9n
	uADQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=YhbmKzhnc40GF2SwQaWjs7cp+GEZil2CtAeiCaNLlkY=;
	b=GO8EgdL4tAhuyOdHb/aKjWrqFwyfSc6+PbE7UqfHO4MjaWsg4oq5jH3nAS1QAQlSd/
	M7lS8YGwBht4tCG7+wod+ZGPxirbCGPtuKPmrc4YVRqUyr82TFGSM7UALRQ1IFz+KtqH
	sZf81/ZX2qkox1xJI2eN1Qb9sSQJ7GEf/XNMnL3I5eY2AuR2ZDbn9YBuAOH38V5l5zGD
	Qe77GEdRorS/XpMGujYf7iDO5GQreCW1yxWD1opfJto0QA5eei7wDKoZXKOco9HbVINH
	v3+DEdCYtwz6dhfdDehrZ57EfuRCEO8xw4KwOMS2iKUCoe3UJ5pkCreFtO7cZgDir41s
	jcMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOPr4FUn7+0uAngM9f4zlK2BeeEThypowUguoXxZ7ytYQgynXEsj8XWT5kq9akIfTlvXog==
X-Received:	by 10.194.122.199 with SMTP id lu7mr40535443wjb.40.1462213683566;
	Mon, 02 May 2016 11:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 20:27:58 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances
Message-Id:	<20160502202758.1a74ecbfeeb76df902a444af@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<57279961.9010802@gmail.com>
References:	<572622FE DOT 9050705 AT gmail DOT com>
	<57279961 DOT 9010802 AT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > Finally a request for some help. While the sidebars evolve I'd like to 
> > temporarily go back to the old Edit Text dialog, I've found where it's 
> > connected in system-gschemrc with
> > (,(N_ "Edit Text...")       &edit-text             "gtk-edit")
> > but I'm having problems tracing where that &edit-text scheme function 
> > ends up. Would someone more familiar with how the scheme code interacts 
> > with the underlying C code be able to point me in the right direction?
> 
> Actually, no need. I found and reverted
> 5ae22191bdbc94a2e49af06d6017aec0ce4280ba, applied the patch from
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1492834 and fixed up the conflicts.
> So back to something vaguely useable for now.
> 
> I'll be interested to see where the sidebar feature goes longer term,
> but for now I think it needs more... something.. before it's useful.
> 
> Iain

The sidebar is indeed very useful although it also use quite a lot of space. One possibility would be to make sidebar visible then dialog usually are.


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -