Mail Archives: geda-user/2016/01/26/05:56:35

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authenticated-Sender: b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601260416150 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
From: myken <myken AT iae DOT nl>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:01:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1601260416150.9035@igor2priv>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 26/01/16 04:21, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> there's no strong demand for blind/burried vias

The conclusion from the poll is also that there is no strong demand to 
support/provide windows binaries.

However IMO blind/burried vias and windows availability are essential to 
attract new users, I do hope that that broader scope is picked-up by 
main stream pcb.


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019