Mail Archives: geda-user/2016/01/21/16:04:37

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113;
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820;
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2XPPZaCmqLGUQbW2RpxTDyKksQ4DeThR3CdcNv6rbQHQnRxebuRQWmeUNhm38tfjTS6d3xI14gIqvYk/15GZVplgCaA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id kf9mr43685068wjb.122.1453410206040;
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:03:24 +0100
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] cleaner version ... --> User survey
Message-Id: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <CAC4O8c88EnAJ1H4YL4rj2O10ihZAz_NYDMSBAWEmdknMNu2b4A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<CAJXU7q8AtP=UOZrM1e+7Vmimc5kxOjyNrrGjqxcanRTjBWsVDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<569BCA7F DOT 70903 AT prochac DOT sk>
<569BCC77 DOT 60700 AT iee DOT org>
<CAC4O8c9_kMdr+3xhe4-CZvUxPGzgqBrLN=Kn+WdGqGVcV1Nbnw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201601172146 DOT u0HLkPnT008691 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<CAC4O8c8u_X54Ro2idbfBf8WToHg0tt2=BJ_irEHcZ7BVH6-_BQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201601191958 DOT u0JJwWro024659 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<CAC4O8c-YYbW5MFG-Na7wPd2YFAmDDOYFm+6QA7ayNAUpDG8jjQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201601200200 DOT u0K20RDb012759 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<569EEF3D DOT 4080307 AT iee DOT org>
<CAC4O8c9eSFkCKxMv0GkpvfZruwGXdrpHnidNjznpttu57ujgNg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201601202141 DOT u0KLf7RJ000985 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<56A00BE0 DOT 1030504 AT iee DOT org>
<CAC4O8c-mYyfJBcSaFg9JLKV4nf42vNazJz7G0fyYSfjpyQ2J3g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > "We" really are pulling in all sorts of directions, and different devs
> > have very different ideas about what a priority should be. Most are
> > centered around some unique use-case or personal preference, which,
> > whilst interesting, is very haphazard. Lets try and put some boundaries
> >
> There's not much to be done about this.  Volunteer devs are going to focus
> on what they themselves need.  The best you can do is try to integrate
> their contributions such that they are findable and usable.
> Britton

That's the big advantage of volunterring. I write what I want myself although it is always nice to have others to discuss with and may have to compromise to get something back.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019