delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2016/01/09/17:02:33

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:02:23 -0500
Message-Id: <201601092202.u09M2NgZ013933@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <5691813A.6030506@iee.org> (geda-user@delorie.com)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] (pcb -- > gerber/ps/eps/...)
References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20160106143629 DOT 4D39D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CACwWb3BXbnQXs+DwVVzmC8DrhwOYxPgVyUhZTPL9bM9cJbHimw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160106164022 DOT D0D4E809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106180912 DOT 42ddf4079d91384f206b7c35 AT gmail DOT com> <20160106191433 DOT 5dc5cb59 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106202817 DOT 56197b2c539d426a1b724c9e AT gmail DOT com> <568E09ED DOT 1080508 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <CACwWb3AhSh-+NNu--bVMGZBfjaoA+hHg7gbXnoyNv3oMq=e17g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <568E6354 DOT 80302 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <20160108002640 DOT 03233b24 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160108175259 DOT 127a3f073616758434f7edff AT gmail DOT com> <20160109020345 DOT 1e07cb84 AT jive> <CAC4O8c-nqs2+9rgsD-Gsks-wSmJ1eCkJ9PFMi3XqMrYE2FO3Ew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160109112851 DOT 1129dc38 AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160109182546 DOT d7e60847ee5bad6f7a27eeb0 AT gmail DOT com> <201601091747 DOT u09HlJZu014443 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160109210738 DOT 4ae238f0 AT jive> <201601092009 DOT u09K9BiB009424 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160109212703 DOT 4acd3eb0 AT jive> <201601092139 DOT u09Ldffi013150 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <5691813A DOT 6030506 AT iee DOT org>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I think you're relying on having to run the pcb app every time you do
> something .. is that really desirable when all you want to do is
> something much smaller than the whole pcb executable is capable of?

A copy of pcb built with the batch HID is not that big, I think you're
way overestimating the savings a separate shared library would offer,
especially since you already have the pcb executable.

Plus, there really isn't a good way to separate the various parts of
PCB's current internals.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019