X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:42:31 +0200
From:	"Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stable and low noise references
Message-ID:	<20151024234230.GA15475@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<CAOuGh89DAYWn49KnuqHO6NHcyB3GUoVsPD4n8FR=wcg8AY6wYw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510162117 DOT 12255 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
	<CAM2RGhSXgieJ+p5i_nQsAUMRQh1rp1PXHx_jB5p2XECY6jgjQQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151023070213 DOT GA19358 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<CAM2RGhS4=PPXf1L5a_E9uABrLviY+L8n+0Opgi6_ZGnipi4grg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRYR61dADi=mRN5CuT_wNMZqc62CUJawBHCOmAaGBD+Qw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151023212815 DOT GA31581 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<CAM2RGhQvNr1B4um1y6DAeaWgTPugBCWiNt6Z4eOvdYCK1j1SrQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151024225457 DOT GA25400 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<562C0FBF DOT 2050604 AT neurotica DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<562C0FBF.2050604@neurotica.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score:	-0.2 (/)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report:	Content analysis details: (-0.2 points)
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
	See
	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
	for more information.
	[URIs: neurotica.com]
	-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4771]
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 07:09:51PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 10/24/2015 06:54 PM, Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >>> This is becoming offtopic, but the LTZ1000A is, to my knowledge, still
> >>> the best reference available in terms of noise and long term stability,
> >>> and until a few years ago, I only used buried Zener references when I
> >>> needed high stability.
> >>
> >> It is. If you look at any of the tear downs people do of meters above
> >> 6 digits they are all using that reference or one made by LT custom
> >> for Fluke.
> > 
> > I was not aware of that, but this means that this device has cornered a
> > market from people accepting to pay for the performance and might not be
> > EOLed too quickly.
> 
>   This is very much an LT thing.  I think I can count the number of
> parts they've EOLed, ever, on one hand.  Maybe two, but not by much.

It is true that LT is one of the most conservative companies in this
respect, they apparently do not easily decide to EOL a given part.
That's one of the reasons for which I sometimes select LT over
otehr products from competitors.

However, they have EOLed a lot of metal can and ceramic packages, for 
example the LT1028 was originally available in metal can and ceramic DIP.
And these packages had at least a higher max operating Tj, so there is
no direct replacement.

I also just discovered that I was wrong about metal can, the LT1021 is
still available in TO-5; however some of the voltage/grade combinations 
have been obsoleted, and this includes all 7V versions.

    Gabriel

- Raw text -