X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=MtamNnhmeJ/ly02cFxUUm7cVofwInoICrzfqYEWrrFc=;
	b=KGwNXQxfHqYu0SUxOFuAgUaPJ501mS+8M1AoKBkoEDPVI+qTMR4HJlnHx0aB58LzhL
	wClI1Vn4/uhajpKg2LnFi3fcgwRJxeagTQyxrZoopR/KLsXTVrnrJ6rQgAdg9uQhrwM+
	zHo8TohaggobpMcCiq9+b0hucNYdk1Siy0OswTloMdRWcDZxhS98TLZ1f0noOg+kWllK
	6VqZI3CijTubWiR24cLfeAcppv3OXGJCiwTpZjmtI3cb7zU7KYtHveAc4972Q05AVSQD
	d6vlZgCw0mOg3HEPwbjk9igI0rScDTrzx9EfoFGl+uhlaQkNarIS6fDGCCVIzBIcAhaA
	0cpw==
X-Received:	by 10.180.72.113 with SMTP id c17mr9011369wiv.6.1445679776107;
	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 02:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:42:54 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings)
Message-Id:	<20151024114254.404927d1f83f363eda3a6886@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<sig.6736be2373.1741065.GrpJ3Tjkdv@jawor>
References:	<20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com>
	<sig DOT 6736be2373 DOT 1741065 DOT GrpJ3Tjkdv AT jawor>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > I think it would be rather good to separate symbols from pin mapping and in
> > such case symbols would have symbolic information only.
> > 
> > In gschem schematic could be started with a fast sketch there details are
> > filled in later then more information is available and this is one of the
> > best things with gschem.
> > 
> > To keep this strength symbols should be used to draw the schematic and
> > mappings selected later. To make this work there would need to be a pin
> > mapping attribute to select which mapping to use, this attribute could of
> > course already have a default value and it could also be to a slot.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I have used other tools there the mapping is added and in such case all
> > information including value must be known then symbol is added which is
> > usually not the case.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Nicklas Karlsson
> 
> I think that one possible solution is to alow nested symbols, so we may create 
> heavy symbol that includes another light symbols. I did some tests and this 
> partially works! 
> ...

Yes, to add information as more information become available is a good workflow. In some cases number of choices later on is fewer for example an MCU then symbol have been selected there usually only are a few different symbols to select from later on. Another reason is quite often the perfect solution is not selected from the beginning so then you discover it is time to choose another symbol you have to thru away less time spent if start is fast.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -