X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=XF92x2YtB4qWZJS1q/soiSDNZJCyDNpLdWu+gBZ9m6E=;
	b=M1rY9h1DmGU2yjtlbZQyWS2bJXF8S076MWUKlKJ9GKa53YM7b9CXdhwSRgbIAjibtO
	/6P/R9dt9HshyxnLBNToN7jWTQ3cpsI3yQrDX9yQpjeK/Zwg6eqY382XPXA7e3sPJ45u
	ybLD8ZAgXqqDsexsmKHRnRxlO3sqEipu1x+SX1gaqSdSq154eRXqvBDzEfBqPg2Ovub2
	MSZ8rM7Sey41ZdyzHv+gcnb2MBZRnYbPHkB08JHFQQ7+TLkPmvxeRW/Dlv2OfRrtTyUr
	9mkb5Twz0fa/aEzkhUah/Go3Pa0H9YuNfyu/BzHwpPOO/HDUFAlgUG3azq6URoYunxqa
	DBxw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.162.162 with SMTP id yb2mr6958647lbb.94.1445477179686;
	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201510220112.t9M1Ccfq013731@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com>
	<34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR+K+dvDdXsbk0Y6LN=-7RhhG5wvtG4i0k4+uMgzd=H0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
	<CAM2RGhTg=nT4aXqdiRz+OmHJ3WiMJntiTZyOH3AdFBZ8dEyT4w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<DA7D969B-6516-4633-831C-FFADA38E1807 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRN5S1KZCNFQwoVTPg3=mC5xrK2z9XTOpWwPuF0iVS+Rg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSvpVvboJ-gdyrojAzggFEBnAr30CKNQBefjci-PA1n6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:26:19 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQhNkShqtN8uyCSd7R+V4FgLXDZTvTC2RTdmKF7C_8ndA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:12 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> There is no valid use case for a net having more than one name.
>
> Analog and digital grounds...

Would you really do it that way or would you have two different nets
that meet in a specific way?

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -