X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=d9Fe+ssBFyIe2TC/Dv4Dwr04ar7rXduBF+O+qjCtbxU=;
	b=cAAM1kMq+ziEqFPQWJaIoyrLRerjw8CbFsbhqeJ07LudAIMXNxRsoqvEawPbL78Y0s
	od9EsSuHc946pOyBJAAC7lGHhUw96dbW5fKcsXH/NBziVWCk/D9bX9QfF7CglTdZjrQb
	qIIskai/PtBo0zhzA37K2AaFwk34yD9aDJkQItwGnTlNW7ylM5mPA7UCuNc8L4nN1bk/
	303N7qBWggxfD1uPbNR5FicjwhaopMZg8iz8B7bsSXhFVBVrIu0Za9yHyRqv9LiET8Tu
	2DimLE5z0WvHIKw3RPjiTzjCvn5IOIIxUNpd73v3clfH+Wku1LrL06m6P4NLv2VEy19v
	IT9g==
X-Received:	by 10.194.242.202 with SMTP id ws10mr1825107wjc.47.1445323531704;
	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:45:26 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings)
Message-Id:	<20151020084526.92cecc051d83d4e3d51ee2ec@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<201510192340.t9JNeo6n020302@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com>
	<201510181843 DOT t9IIhmWo025346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20151018234424 DOT c0551dad9bef0859130239d9 AT gmail DOT com>
	<36B94694-F2AC-4A75-A8EB-40A1CE9A534C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510182225 DOT t9IMPkxK032763 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20151019003814 DOT f62620bf0fec77e65104c105 AT gmail DOT com>
	<BED51F9A-F6FF-4A23-B18B-C2EC8BB9DAB6 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510190242 DOT t9J2gl7w009345 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20151019092555 DOT 46eed4540c2d2044bbeab878 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1A419AED-FCCA-4B1F-8589-912435534E2E AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510191647 DOT t9JGlu4j024585 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<041FF42A-691F-4E6B-9DEB-8C6B3C2F3E53 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510191850 DOT t9JIop8Y029095 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<A5C4636C-6064-4D9C-9F55-03185FE35379 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510192055 DOT t9JKt2o6005861 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<1E816300-E31E-4B85-B51D-7EAEC5A466BF AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510192110 DOT t9JLAFKG007281 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<AAAC7015-AF0E-41BE-83F0-C64862CF2670 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510192340 DOT t9JNeo6n020302 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > You also wrote:
> > 
> > > What I want is a way to reliably map an instance of a device with its
> > > schematic symbol, without the user having to jump through hoops to
> > > satisfy some hidden "rule" about how to create schematics.
> > 
> > How is it hard for a user to understand that symbols need to be
> > distinguishable at the schematic level?
> 
> From the user's point of view, they're distinguishable.  There's this
> one, and that one :-) Why should we force the user to decide
> packaging, slotting, and unique numbering, right at the beginning,
> when they're just tossing a design together?  Even as late as layout,
> they could change the packaging and thus change the slotting (for
> example, switching from a quad-nand to two dual-nand packages).

You are absolutely right packaging, value and slotting is usually not the first step.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -