X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ujbKeTvfsZA0YCvf3zt5xbN6jd74dFVAoIEPsezso68=;
	b=cD1eiwTSYvLLO4l8S45sntWHW4yhyCASNesX7nhVqKJCGUv6/8cIekS3svZlxj/+D7
	IO/5Nj056yohDI9s47XifxF4Hgs/arKYEx4QH8kWhn2OOIZquU4/FyGD2zX0Wv+7xVvP
	xyu5xz1QB9I2vgy1IoknWjmEAAGabc/HeRM//vjJb0SsAdL/myEZfv/1Fe8/+YGhiwkT
	PnCsOhK0O35cOTNzPD9RqguiRE93LcippO+dxFkNYwZPWA3tyKX1+LlhqQVXpC9+wy2S
	q9EFQJDhQNPVNEfGIM510/Tr3k13uI61zbLhHlJ9Th2wpHR3V+dFae1MOJiNNwsXscSX
	SyUw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.64.72 with SMTP id m8mr1672578lbs.41.1444831417561; Wed,
	14 Oct 2015 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xM6BcuGq2oHRMuT2RDrZCB0XHrLUSQZLSvq1mPSEP3sTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTMnybSnYgnNhVZGA6PTvyJu+=Kzd5LX2HMqxT1F4LoRg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTPPtqmWVa3=Kf-PeN+WS5Tn4J+D0Ri6R_4OrQOk+LFKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT8WzhwvzFx3Rfv8vN-f=i1=uWuLF+48VygSRtfdzdo-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR+K+dvDdXsbk0Y6LN=-7RhhG5wvtG4i0k4+uMgzd=H0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151014084734 DOT 47c681e21a7a6f2ab1a6b86f AT gmail DOT com>
	<9E26BFD4-A144-44E4-BEDC-98C4E1822DA7 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAGde_xM6BcuGq2oHRMuT2RDrZCB0XHrLUSQZLSvq1mPSEP3sTQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:03:37 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQ_SuHi3zRyzXqvROmo9gg1iKzd_Lt9BuJBbqKvoVF8Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9EE3ikA013677
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
(svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> On 14 October 2015 at 15:41, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> If we use the power of the architecture, we can make those changes without
>> the hazard. We have a transparent file format and a powerful scripting
>> facility. One source of this controversy is that many developers won’t use
>> Scheme. Fine, but then you can’t responsibly work on improving gschem or
>> gnetlist because everything not in Scheme takes away from the flexibility.
>
>
> I am wondering what this would mean to truly hierarchical schematics and
> netlist creation containing true buses/bundles of nets and pins with geda.

It means nothing in that context.

> --
> Svenn



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -