X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
X-Virus-Scanned:	clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net
Message-ID:	<561E5C80.107@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:45:36 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
References:	<1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAM2RGhTMnybSnYgnNhVZGA6PTvyJu+=Kzd5LX2HMqxT1F4LoRg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhTPPtqmWVa3=Kf-PeN+WS5Tn4J+D0Ri6R_4OrQOk+LFKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhT8WzhwvzFx3Rfv8vN-f=i1=uWuLF+48VygSRtfdzdo-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhR+K+dvDdXsbk0Y6LN=-7RhhG5wvtG4i0k4+uMgzd=H0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhROpz_3y2JB=xEkEQ3CMHqHJ_WZxqVrbQhP4q2mg40h8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <C8AC7729-F0BC-4CFA-95DA-65CCEF10EC4E AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhTSPvQguBwNQRXEnkk5snEWxi0kTe-NXv3x42Xs6Q426Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <28E68A64-515C-4BA2-802E-EC4F77D395D5 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhTN9VsiL9fp67zDC1nQg4XcSJ7cyveEvRm7seeyhbjq+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhTN9VsiL9fp67zDC1nQg4XcSJ7cyveEvRm7seeyhbjq+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9EDji3Z011330
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/13/2015 10:22 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> If you really believe in this statement ideologically we should remove
> s_conn from the core and redo it in scheme.

That would be a probably low bugs way...

and then there's:

On 10/13/2015 11:11 PM, John Doty wrote:> Maybe you should look at implementing your ideas in the Xorn context. No Scheme. This is 
perhaps the future. Roland certainly seems prolific with it: maybe it’s a quicker way, too.

Not bad from planning viewpoint, but then you're the one preparing to do some coding.

Please just try to simplify whenever you can and don't use any inheritance of objects if you start
using xorn that has that python capability...in such long lived volunteer driven code,
inheritance is likely just to cause bugs rippling through for every bug fixed.

Modern and progressive, huh?  :-)

I love this title!  -->  https://medium.com/javascript-scene/inside-the-dev-team-death-spiral-6a7ea255467b

- Raw text -