X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:14:22 +0200
From:	"Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Clutterless user interface or even more custom
	special super features?
Message-ID:	<20151005151422.GA29508@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<56100AF8 DOT 4090802 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<muq108$s12$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20151005072529 DOT GA26068 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<201510051501 DOT t95F1VIU019439 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201510051501.t95F1VIU019439@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score:	-1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report:	Content analysis details: (-1.0 points)
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	-0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
	[score: 0.2498]
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:01:31AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > I agree with your points but I dislike the new naming, many poor choices 
> > in PCB may be due to the first author being not being a native english
> > speaker (element among them).
> 
> Um, "lock names" et al was my choice, and I'm definitely a native
> english speaker...

In this case you tried to be a bit too terse IMO.

    Gabriel

- Raw text -