X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1443761552; bh=lwuYk3X8m0S1/q1Dcv1Hf3Jn600FzasdgdBah4O0Cwo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From:Subject; b=QgKUNZJnNC1jzlHWKs/6HamdoVWaTEn9jo9xsg6FgqlmqZgGien2Btp3ZwUqTAV/L0LwaEGfrBk+/3bJbuzCkwvrGdTfOEWAy25FgLQ/JlO4RnHm1/2wqPtLbzf8Du5iJUT/MoIfi1fybABeDPnOmGBL1ZgMmMt84vWdwzXGjuO4Vm2Yo+HgWLSy+MEMsz2dZ29BXguWaB+508pwqI5Ad6lZOvBLRytQ2MFm5r678uOrKS4OQcc3ZNFdMoc7H66cn6K0XOFEpQ/YkqQgy5/erYWKdp+E9WDc5vdCdbjeqpIkE4xKqy+vMDyd9BvfO1IvUSwJbo5tms2WK9zl9HXoAg==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:	9297 DOT 69531 DOT bm AT smtp206 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:	ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG:	5vuvSkwVM1nIyaSkAql4cRG5n_9TFlJCVN_ED6BxuP_lTLx
	8F2etz3OrRwsQOCkwvU2cOgyni4GHcjpBU05ukgo_y47C8EBNCE47ArFShFJ
	vMohSLEVnqdNBEsQc7m244Ag468QpuqRFT0sp1s0pa.OZyzMRNVYsgWxzF2n
	VihxpMRm__iM39B055vRznnh0pc0bxQJbwDPxEOKb7Euql1dugjNgMuXponJ
	k4yjn8uZKBlTqg6CfuzwnsIcezgCqcCLLEtMr4Gm1OMF7BqSHqbnvaIVMMUd
	DyvfQ7tSliPq1ebymjg5kC0gp942Xpr1G9VogFXo1QoDhmc.ENhxe9PkcQz4
	jNnDEvH_gwluzrQCxTCn42x6t1OPgsagkg6ERE5T4d7NJV_j30xp8_ooq3zN
	mZPMI1LmuKdI18kGXtlfu3c3eAFqBRdcHmOx2VPbLRdDNWybki_hcMb7p0H2
	vc8Fn8ytK4esDhfpKIKrIEcPug9h0k8WbmwDgw3RWcq56AE008.6n_UGz4I7
	ZvWVEmUO.I1s9n0ssnVQSH2rvoFqLpoeNycjDTeX9ww1ruc.znMHY
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA--
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
From:	"Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201510012306.t91N6MXc027775@envy.delorie.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:52:29 -0700
Message-Id:	<3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To:	"geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t924qca0021127
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:06 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
>> You can trust your eyes, they have 541 members. Five hundred and
>> fourty-one. So far I'm not aware of a disaster over there.
> 
> That is not an admin group.

Looking at the members in kicad, it appears that two people are admins in that group. The others are only “approved.”

Although the appearance isn’t fantastic, I agree with the need for admins in gEDA. From my perception, the separate groups isn’t good because it provides a second data point along with the separation on the mailing lists. I disagree with the developer mailing list being separate. In my perception, this separation creates second class citizens.

Speech is free, commit access… not so much.

Ed

- Raw text -