X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	MBQCsm/WGN1DOR4XCOb5BL6OibslVOPZUoOse2U0gWw=; b=fCSITG3faW+xfp74
	+jMvpCxw9ofYoO02cG9gkycSx5yQJcXAREL7HY+6PdhceXUdwuvN/1Zqst5UM1FL
	uJAPC6X3gt2iDSiukWXTMS6zCuWcq29bbTNG+SulKzg57PiAstOtkyg6t+0UJuUP
	nFEnkyfk9kDUTGpGAyXJR+Fveco=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co>
	<560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
From:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status:	N1110
Message-ID:	<560DCC35.9010505@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2015 02:13:41 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201510012306.t91N6MXc027775@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 02.10.2015 um 01:06 schrieb DJ Delorie:
>> https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>
>> You can trust your eyes, they have 541 members. Five hundred and
>> fourty-one. So far I'm not aware of a disaster over there.
> 
> That is not an admin group.

As far as I can see it's their only Launchpad team, there is no "KiCAD
Administrators".

> Do we need more groups?

As you ask me: gEDA needs fewer groups. Especially this "Administrators"
group is pointless. Ideally there'd be one group for all parts of gEDA.


I'm aware you likely disagree with me on this one, but for me there is
no such thing like "ownership" in an open source collaborative project.
If there are owners at all, it's everybody contributing. As soon as one
tries to kind of take over this ownership from the owners, these owners
( = contributors) walk away.


> If you'd like us to have a geda users launchpad thing for everyone and
> their grandmother to participate in, let's talk about that.  Just
> don't call it an admin team (because it isn't) and lets talk about it
> before creating it.

Excellent! Invitation happily accepted.


For other list readers and regarding Launchpad teams in general: being
an owner of such a team brings almost no more privileges than a single
user account: one can change these texts on top of the team page, one
can open a bug tracker and edit the texts shown there, one can upload
the icons, and that's pretty much all of it. The only exception is the
obvious thing needed for a team: one can accept members. There's no
connection to the Git repository, so no risk there. One also can't
prohibit people from filing bugs or commenting on existing bugs.
Needless to say, such kind of controls were pointless anyways. To sum
up, such an "admin" team is almost a hoax.

Founding gEDAhead had only three reasons: to allow a team-owned PPA, to
make very clear that contributors are welcome and to allow people
contributing. In this regard I consider it to be successful.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -