X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] About reinventing the wheel, and how to avoid it
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<55F451F4.8000100@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:53:28 -0600
Message-Id:	<AD39C282-9689-46B8-8957-4958D5532B8B@noqsi.com>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509111150410 DOT 2482 AT lichen> <B94E2C24-8B63-46FC-A551-9E4B14B817C9 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509111624 DOT t8BGOPYV000685 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <F24E14C9-8427-4688-A27A-1EBE0F669995 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509111732 DOT t8BHWnF7005271 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <960028A6-F16B-4276-B838-E9F0D2959A6F AT noqsi DOT com> <55F32375 DOT 2020505 AT ecosensory DOT com> <FC9C2933-89CE-44FD-A9EE-CA2721405ACE AT noqsi DOT com> <201509111941 DOT t8BJfqWl010427 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <D3D5A923-FAF9-4665-A0DB-A8D6A8BEA5A3 AT noqsi DOT com> <CA+uY=MS5ZOTHXDe9taav+0tCiZOqhtAJU2KO-xyRA3SrQVvLNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201509112020 DOT t8BKKBgI012564 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <E872F1BC-8FA7-449E-BA6D-5841AC79A465 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509112058 DOT t8BKwF3b013774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6341DF3E-543D-4E36-9B01-6B5B950208C4 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509121245420 DOT 3577 AT lichen> <9D45499A-BC67-4B2F-A285-34C49ECC20B0 AT noqsi DOT com> <55F451F4 DOT 8000100 AT ecosensory DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8CGrcBF022483
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sep 12, 2015, at 10:25 AM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:

> On 09/12/2015 10:51 AM, John Doty wrote:
>> Test cases are important, but I don¢t think it¢s necessary to have add-on modules maintained with the core sources in order to test them together.
> 
> 
> Why?  Roland made a clear case for that.

Successful projects like Python keep core and add-ons separate.

Development of add-ons has much lower potential for negative impact than development of the core. Core development involves a fair amount of consensus-building. Add-ons are thus easier and more pleasant to develop. This, in turn, creates virtuous positive feedback. Having application function in add-ons encourages the core developers to keep the core simple and friendly to add-ons, which encourages more add-on development.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -