X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=a9HOUwGSh9zSejGD9AZoNukCyErBl9Fkui69DL7egfc=;
	b=W5xilpAX+XdrhRGwZiNY9RPGKlEeIonzwVcAsp85Z4D7HQn53B2tukd2cie29v336M
	37ohF1qOxF7tNxlDCPclWJ246kReL4oUaV9COp6iQ3o0to3D4KCqlndCU++tVyNpFO8R
	Rl2s76KJ29p8d8TqEItaYSbLX/dmikMliWQX31PdfNp8EUAr0y3r7N1McVAyI3MUugef
	StdL9q25dXFSune7QFhaZ+5Wm2mhF1tUIu4Xy0BAOz/eKH/4bWVn4g16ahhOqW9FpvsM
	RzWchw7CED9Ya+tT2P2XDO4HHw5GSjTKA+DXfnO3H8WK5kpq3GjrEyiSlKB/hBFkeuwe
	GUuw==
X-Received:	by 10.180.84.99 with SMTP id x3mr5973416wiy.16.1442058662973;
	Sat, 12 Sep 2015 04:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:50:56 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] shortest way towards parsing .pcb files outside pcb
Message-Id:	<20150912135056.ac8c660f47e01b6a89c40e08@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<20150912124632.3347c70a@jive.levalinux.org>
References:	<CAC4O8c_XFEAgyrokrwwavB0C+OjWXCB5xptkVwMx2i_t960qFg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55F3FD8F DOT 4090709 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20150912124632 DOT 3347c70a AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:46:32 +0200
"Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:25:19 +0200
> "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > A more worthwhile goal might be to /replace/ pcbs current storage and
> > storage handling.
> 
> Yes, this is what I/we try to achieve. My roadmap is this:
> 
> 1. Define the new data structure.
> 
> This is what I'm doing nowadays.
> 
> 2. Write importer/exporter to the new data structure for the current PCB.
> 
> This will allow us doing tests on the new data structure. Strictly speaking
> with the existing PCB, we can fiddle only with the subset of the new data
> structure.
> 
> 3. Rewrite PCBs internal data structures and data handling.
> 
> 4. Modify the HIDs to deal with the new data structure.
> 
> Does this sound reasonable?
> 
> I'm sorry that I'm slow. I have so many personal/dayjob tasks.
> 
> However, I'm on halfway to convince one of my college to work on pcb.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lev
> 
> -- 
> 73 de HA5OGL
> Op.: Levente
> 

Did you put into any branch?

- Raw text -