Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/07/21/21:09:55

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113;
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id ly5mr12824404lbb.57.1437527377752;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507211410260 DOT 2035 AT nimbus>
<3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com>
<1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
<0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com>
<CAOFvGD4ijprW7hoaJNYjo55A1=mnQuWCiK7Sku_WqC3NeUzgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201507211821 DOT t6LILegK016798 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<55AE9814 DOT 4030702 AT ecosensory DOT com>
<D24828BF-54B9-40A5-A51C-640EEAEC3D00 AT noqsi DOT com>
<CAC4O8c8pKqq8kai14rgjU7stXPTufNX+w7i=2Ty5pxU2cTKLXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<CAM2RGhSyn6Lm1fWtRVT-BCUJCr=RH5hJCdnTAzk90fZ78wQF-g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<9168C128-F740-45C7-95BD-1F5AB8C7DACB AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 21:09:37 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by id t6M19ftN030493
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:34 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> I can only guess that John D. dislikes having to place the NA, Input,
>> Output, I/O or Passive symbols at the end of his nets. Really I think
>> they are ugly with out something at the end.
> To me, they are clutter unless functional (as in hierarchy). I do use busses a lot, though. And then, there’s the odd signal that needs to connect to the far left side and the far right side. Much easier, and more readable, to name two segments than to draw a difficult to follow line all the way across.

The part that bothered me about the unconnected nets getting redblocks
is that we don't apply the same principle to unconnected busses.

That is why I liked my idea of how to do the netlist to schematic
step. It leaves how to go from the pin to a bus or io or what ever up
to the user.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019