Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/07/21/20:09:28

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113;
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id mj4mr34890723lbb.3.1437523758434;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507211410260 DOT 2035 AT nimbus>
<3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com>
<1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
<0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com>
<CAOFvGD4ijprW7hoaJNYjo55A1=mnQuWCiK7Sku_WqC3NeUzgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201507211821 DOT t6LILegK016798 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<55AE9814 DOT 4030702 AT ecosensory DOT com>
<D24828BF-54B9-40A5-A51C-640EEAEC3D00 AT noqsi DOT com>
<CAC4O8c8pKqq8kai14rgjU7stXPTufNX+w7i=2Ty5pxU2cTKLXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:09:18 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Britton Kerin
(britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:44 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:05 PM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:
>>> I would not mind seeing a red dot appear when the netlist via rat lines goes open circuit.
>> Another heuristic? Please, no. We already have the misfeature that gschem decorates open net segment ends differently by a flawed heuristic.
> How is it flawed?  Because you sometimes want dangling net ends?  I haven't
> seen this feature screw up and wouldn't want it to go away.

This is why I suggested instead of drawing short net lines with
netname attributes attached to make the connections. The connections
would be there and you would have the red blocks to indicate where the
changes were made.

I can only guess that John D. dislikes having to place the NA, Input,
Output, I/O or Passive symbols at the end of his nets. Really I think
they are ugly with out something at the end.

> Britton



- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019