X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
X-Virus-Scanned:	clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net
Message-ID:	<55A53360.4000707@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:05:52 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The new to do
References:	<CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com> <7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACwWb3DbmOZbtb9Hrp2JvvG7-toryXuequQA=YV7X6ss762zsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <CAM2RGhTT__nWCkA4y36rb24yT8xP=o1nR04H=DNqTJiu=naSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A4042E DOT 5060402 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhS=5xq0_oN4e0M55Kor4bcnXNn3NfLvRZoi7Vw9Aq1ZXg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A41B30 DOT 50602 AT neurotica DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<55A41B30.50602@neurotica.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/13/2015 03:10 PM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>    Yes it has come a long way, which is great, but I think a bounty for
> certain bugs or certain features might still be a good idea.  I myself
> know I'd toss a few bucks in someone's direction for the implementation
> of some stuff useful in the microwave world, like


design aids for
> controlled-impedance traces.
>
>    Another very useful thing I'd pay for would be the inclusion of an
> attribute in gschem which tells PCB "this net needs to be 20mils" and
> have PCB automatically handle that.


Really good concrete goals, Dave.  They are quick to state, but include
much function so whoever is coding can keep checking as they go whether an idea of implementation
satisfies the overall system goal or not.

These two have simple overall needs -- that can be handled by attributes in gschem/gnetlist
and adding a way to tag drawing objects with attribs in PCB.

- Raw text -