X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<1436310569.678.169.camel@ssalewski.de>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:50:29 -0600
Message-Id:	<13C9F448-9022-4AE2-9BF2-28220B6E75F1@noqsi.com>
References:	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150707183339 DOT GA1817 AT alpha2> <559C3667 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <1436305751 DOT 678 DOT 145 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <6F56FB28-1576-4B94-B7C4-B455B5C0A4CF AT noqsi DOT com> <1436310569 DOT 678 DOT 169 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t67NocWI024226
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Jul 7, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:

> Of course. Large parts of programming is thinking and learning API usage
> of libraries. Learning and using one of the easy languages is not too
> much effort compared to that.

And yet the unfamiliarity of Scheme is seen as a barrier by many.

> 
> Can you remember PSchem? I have still the link on my homepage:
> https://github.com/PSchem/PSchem
> 
> Was a gschem clone in Python, but seems that nobody contributed.

I looked at it. It wasn't a finished gschem replacement, and I’m reasonably happy with gschem as is (there are a couple of fairly recent misfeatures I wish I could turn off, but they’re not serious).

To me, schematic capture is in good shape. Schematic processing, although geda-gaf’s greatest strength, is still not where it could be. Roland’s effort is thus of more interest, although this xorn thing is a barrier to comprehension, maybe an unnecessary complication.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -