X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=o73ToHewM+U+Bb6GEIG4gug/DvBkVH/HlDz/uxz+yn8=;
	b=bU8TnK+kYCO8bLRjazU+uzpex5LvKeDB7M2qg2PLdp/NIXCS2sj8+xENEm9MS8/Iym
	3SEFM1JIFTxiavuxPO04/PwwGC06HJRYmLjcxp+kPFOiM6j5sd4rPPnnqiVCIfyc0Ki9
	EWMnAWZ+sH8TFhZkbU1cOfJmSP33NMwytXEdhmeRTcEKHGAHMzP05fpQLI8ppN+MNVcP
	U9VbXyI60P+rfUCpMuAfzhiC5/RDQRs+QH0JCEQxsuvhiwLRB3y2Ed7qkLK+AWZJ8lFU
	AmNv+nMPZ2Nscw1oUkmobmI1bRvacVwyw2bW8lGNkSsD036GKp1/mTfay21DgctPP84I
	CpfQ==
X-Received:	by 10.152.36.102 with SMTP id p6mr5963061laj.19.1436306792070;
	Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 01:06:29 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
Message-ID:	<20150707220629.GF18930@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507040542390 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150707160130 DOT GA18930 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<1436289239 DOT 678 DOT 43 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150707205018 DOT GC18930 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<1436303890 DOT 678 DOT 123 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1436303890.678.123.camel@ssalewski.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 11:18:10PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 23:50 +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > Guile Scheme is a high level language, too. And there are GUI
> > toolkits for it. However, we don't use them and invent our own wheel,
> > probably being afraid of new dependencies. Recall, for instance,
> > gwave/gaw, if you're aware of them.
> 
> I don't know much about Scheme, but I do know that Lisp dialects are
> interesting and powerful languages in general. But I although know that
> lisp is generally only teached in CS at university, people with other
> technical background may have a hard time to learn it. At least for
> younger people it may be hard to find motivation to learn it.
> 
> I don't know much about performance of Scheme. For some EDA stuff, PCB
> related auto-router or DRC, performance may be important. For simulation
> too. So I would choose only a really fast language today.

Probably the following links to the blog of one of the guile developers
could be of interest for you, if you want to have some notion about
guile performance and work now and in the near future and in comparison
with Python/Ruby:
  http://wingolog.org/archives/2013/11/26/a-register-vm-for-guile
  http://wingolog.org/archives/2014/01/19/elf-in-guile

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -