X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<1436291983.678.53.camel@ssalewski.de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:59:43 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<1FB0D727-9B89-4017-8FDE-7D9EEBE1589D@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507040542390 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150707160130 DOT GA18930 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<1FB0D727-9B89-4017-8FDE-7D9EEBE1589D AT sbcglobal DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.12.11
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 10:20 -0700, Edward Hennessy
(ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> To increase the number of developers on the project, we would need to
> find people interested in EDA, willing to contribute to open source,

Yes, I have to admit that there is really not much hope.

All FOSS development seems to have dried out in the last 10 years. Linux
kernel contribution is now mainly by companies, not by independent
people. GTK have very few developers left. For KiCad Mr Hollenbeck
retired, and the remaining Kids seems to generate much noise, but do not
contribute much value. Cern? I dont't know. Qucs? Maybe theory is too
difficult. Fritzing? Have not heard much about it in the last years.

- Raw text -