delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=76tuqDMSYBp6mOAgEeHTZzrMWm+YaewzNfJr8L4Wak0=; | |
b=xrgXovT59Mv262pTAyK+TpijM6AwOf0rdzMCHn1R/ie/1dliN7L3tB0MsEX3KZPp7T | |
ZypfEnesrKouUvR1pNN4sy4mgcVVl/qu40/R4Gs/H29a1Vx7JZSXFp2wBhW2X8nR4sLy | |
PkRQVoT4k2//TCeD99/yjUqoKUgiOm2hz+3K94pKdOzkmWfValCTh9QEQdqQGVqc8G9t | |
43T7BllgxSRXWcCBov3UnC+KRpC+i32fw/IyUbDWOZHmjCxym29MO4nrIQbzIrxk9Jb1 | |
6cNjvySXKU0DxQTs/Ppi9IN45iHKtBZ+hmOilWneapuxAenmYAzMc6o5qNw1lE9oWZ0t | |
Xssg== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.202.222.213 with SMTP id v204mr16523949oig.103.1426618391028; |
Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:53:11 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <20150317182617.22729.qmail@stuge.se> |
References: | <CAHLh21Cdm=YZuqCQ+gCHSviJquahr6cnAQ-VBLR4BSs-nfHOig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAOFvGD4+4bHXNYLvePi70wb_1A4=dQgb_Ov3xBghoKbXQUsSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<5508413E DOT 4000405 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
<C2997FC5-EE8B-47E4-A8D5-24B6D22B2D64 AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<20150317182617 DOT 22729 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
Date: | Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:53:10 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CAOFvGD7vgcVoHw6OeE98iA60755n8gbs6jbtv56O5+AcqWM1vQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] pcb alternatives |
From: | Jason White <whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se> wrote: > ... > Which elementary objects would you use instead of the current > predefined ones, and what would be a couple of concrete advantages? I know I am not John, who the question was directed at. However, what would be beneficial to the organization of information in PCB is the addition of (and use of!) a generic (and I stress generic!) grouping element. This element would have the following features: (1) to contain graphical primitives (2) to contain other groups which may in turn contain other groups or graphical primitives. Without the ability to cleanly deal with things such as sub-layouts, panelized designs, and multi-layer footprints is greatly diminished. The burden of this is passed onto the user who must try to compensate, somehow... -- Jason White
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |