delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:35:52 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201409240635.s8O6ZqOw019084@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
CC: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20140924062143.GA21949@visitor2.iram.es> (message from Gabriel |
Paubert on Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:21:44 +0200) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Banging my head against the guile-for-windows wall |
References: | <20140923045453 DOT 56dc3de2 AT akka> |
<CAOuGh8_bfL2KJDLt-qkU7v0wS3UBkbHeej6ScVLJJfHnOR_6oQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<lvssr7$lun$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
<5421FF2E DOT 4010709 AT sbcglobal DOT net> | |
<lvtcdd$53a$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
<20140924040432 DOT 22429 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20140924062143 DOT GA21949 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > This is ugly but if void * and int are the same size it is harmless. I've seen way too many platforms where pointers and "int" are different sizes, to give this one a pass... Worse, on the msp430, large-model pointers are neither int-sized nor long-sized. Not that gEDA will ever run on an msp430 ;-) > I consider this one a spurious warning, it may probably be silenced by inserting > an useless and ugly cast, but I really wonder on which drugs the compiler > writers were when they decided to add it. You should always be able to pass > a non-const argument to a const parameter. You're confusing a const argument with an argument which is a *pointer to* a const value. It's the latter that gcc is warning about, because the pointed-to types are different. One could still argue that gcc should ignore pointer-to-nonconst passed as pointer-to-const (and perhaps the trunk gcc does) but otherwise the logic is sane - the pointers point to different types. It's like passing "struct foo *" when the function wants "struct bar *".
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |