delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=0C0phheaD1DqGrxFxj3x43YGAwAHoldyy9vVyp45xNU=; | |
b=jplTdvlV2zuGExS/Objc3YDOqn8s56QMnCJMWH6pBacWzUxvjeedq5bpR2cO3VX5IE | |
pwBKK+OqEDyzb1XnBdMNJTlpl3aNTwcmL3XCRXcktXYZ0FZ5WqP9QxFfw87GPdbE/ICZ | |
n1valIZqiPW6zNApCCxq3i5b+dpRYkkdnfjaxdDygmO0yBJ+0SuIXYKyVf2wjacDJBuO | |
4bftjQ/zENgWXOUxEiXNXUdlFrt/vZLPmB0xj1p73SlIt5ZfW5eMzYKpxuqRQ4J3VJkM | |
2Eufg99SrYGMAYflYeqCbg4ifQZeegjjBbxqLvEauXljKh0rmAqIYen/o7uuX9payWyX | |
aedQ== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.182.213.100 with SMTP id nr4mr21394883obc.39.1404602874975; |
Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:27:54 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <1403807718.25929.19.camel@pcjc2lap> |
References: | <CANtXPpj_eTa70imy2an9aYTzfm845b_mrb-WRU7OzgTw08Hksw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<1403800169 DOT 25929 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> | |
<E117BA70-D29C-4908-AA62-9AE4813EF97E AT gmail DOT com> | |
<1403807718 DOT 25929 DOT 19 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> | |
Date: | Sat, 5 Jul 2014 19:27:54 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CANtXPph+NixZZJYeHM1xpTWqbc+G=AK1gDsAvz=gBOm=AaguuA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Building geda-gaf on Mac OS X 10.9 fails on |
scheme_object.x (also on FreeBSD?) | |
From: | Charles Lepple <clepple AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 14:12 -0400, Charles Lepple wrote: >> Which version of Guile and the C preprocessor worked for you? (guile-snarf seems to call gcc -E) > > Seems to be gcc-4.8 and guile-snarf from the ubuntu package guile-2.0.9+1-1ubuntu1 Hmm, interesting - I tried replacing guile-1.8-snarf with guile-2.0-snarf and things built. Now I'm checking with the Fink maintainer of the guile18/20 packages. > Do you have the commit d01e46055593990e918d94e4b30609df989561b4 > > build-sys: guile-snarf should use host CPP. > > Fix cross-compilation by making sure that guile-snarf uses the same C > preprocessor that will be later used for compilation. I think it's in there - I set the -x flag in the #! line for guile-snarf and it seems to be passing in a reasonable value for $CPP. At any rate, both ${cpp} invocations look the same in the various guile-*-snarf scripts, so I suspect the problem is in the sed script (which is different). -- - Charles Lepple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |