X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<531D222C.8060101@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:23:40 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] identical symbol names
References:	<CAG4ve9LgHNoVZoGaGgF67tadJ_n=L6Uy1g=UPPrkM0fL6Rgufw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140127234944 DOT 924148045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAG4ve9+3jhFJ1Cr6CLUyLX_y02uigJECiUCwxjUWdP=heVocqg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140128201110 DOT DF7D78045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20140129072550 DOT GA24560 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAG4ve9+v9QxNRaPSFkmGfr6bKsv7km-Gt_gwXF7Eh4TX+AmNug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL2JBUdF93kZF-iQ9Rv+VTN3iXoT+6C4LoBi5qaMxof=sA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9+QsUf=nVXPe-f3VddGiqHn8sjZUJNkdu3QV1cOQDWiAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <86CABBE6-EE80-4347-B7AA-3F5A8DA4C658 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAG4ve9LX0mYk2a1zpfWJJC=OP5Weq9pt3PF7_Nqx5vX4wpR=Bg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1394402434 DOT 2151 DOT 28 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <20140309235005 DOT 783608020170 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
In-Reply-To:	<20140309235005.783608020170@turkos.aspodata.se>
X-RR-Connecting-IP:	107.14.168.142:25
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 03/09/2014 06:50 PM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
>   But bigger schematics also
> means a lot of other things that I don't have experience about. My guess
> that putting the symbol in a library section of the file simply doesn't
> cut it.
Right.  For chip design, or large flat organic semi circuit design,
you use and reuse modules with the same name again and again
and hit the identical name problem sooner.  References to same-name-but-different-content
modules in different libraries is normal in large designs.

John griessen

- Raw text -