| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seznam.cz; s=beta; |
| t=1392884370; bh=BOtYwdaggasZef1ISZrLUi1bSlox/+30FRsprcMr4Cw=; | |
| h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Mime-Version: | |
| X-Mailer:Content-Type; | |
| b=dNmYgY8hcNL9DIuWO1601DTksi3Cj9fO35NjTsKfq3GnH9zBBGvPmO5zt1emVaVdX | |
| ZIC2K/eI7CFS7jlpq3Ake14vRDVM0dQXJjZOj1v8vReW2tdvrRrzMA1zRpKe/Ffl0I | |
| JI45LTxldfmq/MBbRJXzwY6c62DZ6dvOhSVosyJU= | |
| From: | "Vaclav Peroutka" <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz> |
| To: | <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:19:28 +0100 (CET) |
| Message-Id: | <3Q3.JW8u.3zIDACCYyBi.1J1RgG@seznam.cz> |
| References: | <CAOkiwat+o+GRSRmv4pqYPvuqwEeXa_+A1esiX_DToDcTLsKKZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| <5305190D DOT 3020507 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 (szn-mime-1.1.2) |
| X-Mailer: | szn-ebox-4.4.138 |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
--=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, is there some "release notes" document with fixed bugs and new features ? I could not find it on geda-project.org Thanks in advance, Vaclav Od: John Griessen <john@> "On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote: > How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? The geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'), > which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the newer version? Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before starting a new project. There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code." --=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_= Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><body>Hello,<br><br>is there some "release notes" document with fixed bugs and new features ? I could not find it on geda-project.org<br><br>Thanks in advance,<br>Vaclav<br><br><p>Od: John Griessen <john@><br></p><br><blockquote>On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote:<br>> How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? The geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'),<br>> which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the newer version?<br><br>Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before starting a new project.<br>There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code.</blockquote></body></html> --=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_=--
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |