X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=o9hjnLJw+PZXrZaV1PWBbQvJBZOLwG2PkHgnRl5fFtA=;
	b=m7/JTltAFFI1apqxhi11uAX5XJgbTdYkmjUrMG2Z3++hjXDv4fUtldVXSbYa0yuOYa
	ct5GvhUNSmzbJF4z02IcnLgdOInrOJsuRph35tmhO4WzZ7sHZqLH4QwPWwXbTuUfHOrq
	PvXPTiCxkrjuy6X6mSiXozRzzzg2hqOOFwKZZiOxKJXttjcfonCiIyKvXJ8kM9yeke0e
	mi68shdu1bE9SF4h8WhAweV6UJn7ov4y6DJjNh7Y9vjMHypSSA4U2rYLEfPZ13bjHcu9
	CZJzJWol33/DNU7oZ0G12ZbIsx4tsaBoSRJRKXEZwFiChejpfKH6PhPwY32e60l7sbkI
	vkiQ==
X-Received:	by 10.112.160.42 with SMTP id xh10mr602856lbb.38.1390127941628;
	Sun, 19 Jan 2014 02:39:01 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:38:58 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gcode test failures
Message-ID:	<20140119103858.GA3300@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20140117091806 DOT GA23500 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20140117094123 DOT GB23500 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201401171323 DOT s0HDNVW8020648 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20140117172250 DOT GA26980 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20140118065030 DOT GB3199 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20140118161442 DOT GA25430 AT shavo DOT dd-wrt>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20140118161442.GA25430@shavo.dd-wrt>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 08:14:43AM -0800, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:50:30AM +0400, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:22:50PM +0400, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> > > Does 'make check' work for you?
> > That is, could you at least confirm that the one pixel difference exists
> > for hid_png3?
> 
> Vladimir, I still see the gcode failures (my message back in April about
> this is what started this thread). But the PNG files are fine.

And as I have already said and as Markus has supposed 2 of 3 failures
depend on the user locale settings.

> I seem to recall there being a 64/32-bit difference on the PNG test...
> though maybe I am imagining that. Are you running a 32-bit system?

Yes. 

> Also, I've forgotten the configure flag to compile a 32-bit binary. Can
> somebody remind me?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3261909/build-32bit-on-64-bit-linux-using-a-configure-script
HTH

- Raw text -