X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=qqeThRlGGM2bRmbNPCuVYbrANN6gtfunAi2qdRw3a6M=;
	b=kpcPjaecefveajjxtOaw/WSPJTiT6E3bGQTDZGoboAU0NVL8rKfJdzRnVc71TcOcoJ
	rSAtvsETlbH5ECaKa2Wkkp5HoQgWpUF5+b5s35EOK3BCzZOj/DjKJqjMGO89HtQUd6KZ
	zSq2bfbjiTLwLgVetwy8C8DeDf2uf/k2vTEbO4XwIAl72EYoYymXYQhMzKBzorUGwnIj
	sk1AhA7UC5/i7vbiEu0W1p6oyUW+v7r47xpNht43OenwX0a1BVC0bW3DCC4RjAsP/G/d
	adqhrsVs2GPwT797I1C37ah9yZuS52sXxCfwfX2lceRBpsTLpG4kpqc75XAuWhPTf3Jx
	7B1A==
X-Received:	by 10.152.170.168 with SMTP id an8mr6207076lac.39.1389685192874;
	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:39:52 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:39:50 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: pcb-1.99z.pt_BR.po
Message-ID:	<20140114073950.GC23401@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20131228191702 DOT GA8259 AT papai DOT Home>
	<20140104212722 DOT GB27890 AT papai DOT Home>
	<20140111082212 DOT GB3281 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20140111105310 DOT GA3164 AT papai>
	<52D12B71 DOT 7000503 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<20140112184537 DOT GA4678 AT papai>
	<20140112194310 DOT GA14137 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20140113082032 DOT GA2667 AT papai>
	<20140113102956 DOT GA4846 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20140114051024 DOT GA1166 AT papai DOT Home>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20140114051024.GA1166@papai.Home>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:10:24AM -0200, Jorge Barros de Abreu wrote:
> Seems to me that what i make was a "hack".
> I do not know to transform my hack in a patch.
> This situation have new files that need to be named.
> Is suitable gpcb-menu.res.in.pt_BR ou gpcb-menu.pt_BR.res.in???
> The proposed file is the first.
> 
> At this moment i discovery a file named pcb-menu.res.in that was not
> translated and this mensage need to be stoped for translate it.

IIUC, you have to work only in the po/ directory. See the files lying
there, for instance nl.po or ru.po.

As of now, there is a bug related to menu internationalization.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/1113758

You can try to apply the patch provided there.

- Raw text -