X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:06:43 +0100
From:	Jan Kasprzak <kas AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 4-pin SPST microswitch
Message-ID:	<20140110230643.GA7128@fi.muni.cz>
References:	<20140110201835 DOT GW20344 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<CAOFvGD5F9on0v+7ug-9qR77f-9OHg5jRLPqQR6wq=-zK4w772Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20140110220844 DOT GZ20344 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1389393738 DOT 2083 DOT 33 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1389393738.2083.33.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
X-Muni-Spam-TestIP:	147.251.48.3
X-Greylist:	Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.7 (tirith.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.35]); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:06:44 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned:	clamav-milter 0.97.8 at tirith.ics.muni.cz
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

	Hello,

Stefan Salewski wrote:
: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 23:08 +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: > 
: > Jason White wrote:
: > : Just a hunch,  try making a footprint with multiple "1" and "2" pins
: > : that correlate to the schematic symbol.
: > 
: > This almost works, thanks! I have modified TYCO_FSMJSM.fp to have
: > two pins named and numbered "1", and two pins named and numbered "2".
: > The resulting .pcb and .net files do almost what I want - pcb considers
: > both pins in a given pair to be part of the same net. Good.
: > 
: > The problem is, that it still requires the pins in a pair to be connected
: > with a PCB trace (it displays a rat line connecting pins 1 and 2,
: > and another connecting pins 3 and 4).
: > 
: > How can I fix that? Thanks,
: 
: Have you tried using an empty string for pin names 2 and 4 in your
: modified footprint file? I can not remember if I have ever done that --
: I guess it may work. But why not connecting the pads? Draw a trace, or
: make an additional (thin) pad in the footprint connecting the pads.

	Empty strings for pin names do not make any change.

	Why not connecting them? I would like to use the in-microswitch
connection between pins 1 and 2 and between pins 3 and 4 as an "additional
PCB layer". I.e. I need the space between those pins for other traces.

-Yenya

-- 
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak  <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| New GPG 4096R/A45477D5 - see http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/pgp-rollover.txt |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/    Journal: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/ |
Please don't top post and in particular don't attach entire digests to your
mail or we'll all soon be using bittorrent to read the list.     --Alan Cox

- Raw text -