X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-UW-Orig-Sender:	fpm AT homer02 DOT u DOT washington DOT edu
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:24:49 -0800 (PST)
From:	Frank Miles <fpm AT u DOT washington DOT edu>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Suppress NC nodes from netlist?
In-Reply-To:	<20140110094326.GA12963@visitor2.iram.es>
Message-ID:	<alpine.LRH.2.01.1401100819370.19632@homer02.u.washington.edu>
References:	<alpine DOT LRH DOT 2 DOT 01 DOT 1401091631360 DOT 13782 AT homer02 DOT u DOT washington DOT edu> <20140110094326 DOT GA12963 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1217 2009-02-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-PMX-Version:	6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.1.10.161515
X-PMX-Server:	mxout12.cac.washington.edu
X-Uwash-Spam:	Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='
	TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_800_899 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Gabriel Paubert wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:38:35PM -0800, Frank Miles wrote:
>> (gschem-gnetlist newbie here...)
>>
>> I'd like to suppress 'not connected' nodes from the gnetlist output.  These have
>> NC symbols attached in gschem.  Is there some simple way that I'm oblivious to?
>> Or is this possible in a newer gnetlist and not mine?  Thanks!
>
> I think it's a kind of "harmless bug" that does not bother most
> netlist writers.

[snip helpful scheme code]

Thanks, Gabriel!  I will have to experiment with this.  I'm sure it is
"mostly harmless", but it's causing me some minor grief with a downstream tool
that I'm using.  Vladimir's suggestion that I simply not use the NC- symbols
causes drc2 to emit an error for unconnected pins, which is also not good.

I'll have to see how to submit a bug report.

 	-Frank

- Raw text -