X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<51B3848C.8030106@neurotica.com>
Date:	Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:22:52 -0400
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: refdes renumber
References:	<CACPio-6QgmXwj8LwYoR6zq1hfXHh8ymmnDNhrJd5oEVg6pt0Gg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-7zTB0N7x8hGALcZzGgaCAexKr5DUb4imd=QAzH7Pj61A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9Jm00oyLb7uLgQjSTjfBpXOL9a0tXkjAQx09325ibChPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-7ucw-yxsykwOyV+p=+xUqKbwHLhQv1ODNS9Qd+gf3GPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9KAB6POcUvMhh3KsCt3eRyWus8L+V1WFyupgL-4QckRJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-7yV1a08b99NyjrGtD0b7qdKWxLPQxA0nUr3qAL9yz7pQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9KKG_4Z6V0V3HCjAjo6jwD=t5AmwGdVgGqYJbM9q6B_zA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-66SHLWYAusnwq0acYBL+QX0uwuuT8zeUotYE90a5pCHQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9KeBYS_Gs_5y2o6ZWVREq0tEFtJiEQbX692SbRzTdSxgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9+wP0VAnXAFpB+gJQHUphnNTYn71_wBphuMafL09k9YnQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <koto2c$r5i$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CACPio-4m=CaiEpRe7wkn61sFVonM=aw-Q2j499__aA916hc2CA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <82BD0858-A229-4675-A3BD-17C7A2056654 AT jump-ing DOT de> <kov5jn$14k$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <kov78o$f89$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <E15D8E0A-EECE-4A05-A009-EA7C6770769F AT jump-ing DOT de> <51B369CB DOT 2000705 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<51B369CB.2000705@sbcglobal.net>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.5.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 06/08/2013 01:28 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
> aerospace company, I treated warnings the same as errors in the code I
> developed.  It was a matter of pride as well as quality.  That is how I was
> trained in the field.  When I compile many Linux packages today and watch the
> numerous warnings scrolling by, I wince.  For that is an indication of the
> quality of the code.  But if I need the function in the application I am
> building, I need to accept it - reluctantly and under protest.  I still
> always fix warnings in my own code.

  Bravo!

              -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -