X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id
	:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=beta; bh=naEe
	58y2wgLGntroXgxPkLEFNpqUlxM4a3phmXtPebM=; b=WaZTxLD+6Wi+KPXjhPQZ
	W01wr1x1YNf14FdxZjO85acs+fjKgXbXWhpLExO66NOxZHSc1rkWN141ZHFCckV2
	atiq1perlwjkttxv7J6hEQklJjThTZ2MbqWK74PHe5vzOMOTYIqtnCdNxHuiN/Kp
	QBOo4ek0vej+ko/QjHjac4s=
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To:	<CACPio-4m=CaiEpRe7wkn61sFVonM=aw-Q2j499__aA916hc2CA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CACPio-6QgmXwj8LwYoR6zq1hfXHh8ymmnDNhrJd5oEVg6pt0Gg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-7zTB0N7x8hGALcZzGgaCAexKr5DUb4imd=QAzH7Pj61A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9Jm00oyLb7uLgQjSTjfBpXOL9a0tXkjAQx09325ibChPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-7ucw-yxsykwOyV+p=+xUqKbwHLhQv1ODNS9Qd+gf3GPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9KAB6POcUvMhh3KsCt3eRyWus8L+V1WFyupgL-4QckRJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-7yV1a08b99NyjrGtD0b7qdKWxLPQxA0nUr3qAL9yz7pQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9KKG_4Z6V0V3HCjAjo6jwD=t5AmwGdVgGqYJbM9q6B_zA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACPio-66SHLWYAusnwq0acYBL+QX0uwuuT8zeUotYE90a5pCHQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9KeBYS_Gs_5y2o6ZWVREq0tEFtJiEQbX692SbRzTdSxgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9+wP0VAnXAFpB+gJQHUphnNTYn71_wBphuMafL09k9YnQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <koto2c$r5i$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CACPio-4m=CaiEpRe7wkn61sFVonM=aw-Q2j499__aA916hc2CA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Message-Id:	<82BD0858-A229-4675-A3BD-17C7A2056654@jump-ing.de>
From:	Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: refdes renumber
Date:	Sat, 8 Jun 2013 11:41:25 +0200
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 08.06.2013 um 01:34 schrieb Nathan Stewart:

> I actually have a working renumber command in the my local working  
> copy
> gui. I sent email to the list but nobody responded, so I figured  
> interest
> was low.

I guess interest in participation in open source software is  
generally very low these days. People no longer care about non- 
blocking bugs, don't look at patches and those doing development  
usually keep the result in their own locker out of an totally  
unfounded fear to mess something up or, worse, don't even get the  
idea their work would be welcome. I see this especially with projects  
trying to do high quality work, not so much with chaotic development  
models used by Linux & Co.

That general note said, please simply commit this renumber command.  
We have source code management, so things can't get worse. I say so  
without even investigating what would be wrong with the current  
renumber capabilities.


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -