Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/01/18/19:33:29

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113;
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id gt10mr3673174igc.73.1358555511515;
Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:31:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <kdc2jk$nd4$>
References: <8738y3iigd DOT fsf AT dome DOT home>
<kd22k1$vna$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
<kd4557$3gn$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
<201301151848 DOT r0FIm62T000949 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<20130115191524 DOT 11400 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
<201301151927 DOT r0FJRdxV003764 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<87mwwaqjs7 DOT fsf AT dome DOT home>
<87y5fs10o6 DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
<201301180857 DOT r0I8vjTw025696 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<kdc2jk$nd4$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:31:51 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Any new geda port for Windows?
From: Bob Paddock <bob DOT paddock AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> They showed signs of the inglorious  "/" vs "\"
> misapprehensions.

Replace all of the "\" and "\\" with a single "/" and it should work,
from looking at your bug report.

It is only the Windows command processor that has the "\" vs "/"
issues, as forward slashes were used to introduce options on the
command line.

In places like header include files #include "dog/cat.h", and I expect
Schem files, forward slashes work just fine as there is no ambiguity
about them introducing command line options.

Now if there really is a hard coded "d:" that is a different issue.

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019